When I went shopping with a friend this afternoon, one of the stores we visited had a few pairs of short jeans. Only two pairs of short jeans were in a size larger than 5. There seemed to be no shortage of regular and long jeans. I tried the short jeans but they didn't work.
Afterwards, we went to Urban Outfitters and tried to find pants in the bargain basement. No luck. All the women's pants' sizes were 25 through 29. I think it was based on waist size, but I wasn't sure if it was supposed to be the "true" waist (around the bottom of the ribcage) or the high hip. Probably the latter. Nearby was a rack of men's jeans. I found two pairs with my inseam whose waist sizes looked right. I was a bit uncertain about translating my waist measurement into a men's waist size, but thought hey, this could be interesting.
The first pair was too tight. The other pair's fit was snug but not suffocating. The back pockets looked funny (in terms of placement), but I couldn't tell if it was the designer's intention or just that the pants were cut for a man. Overall, the pants didn't fit nicely enough to buy, but there was one feature which almost made me wish I had a better build for men's pants — the front pockets. The front pockets were about 7-8 inches deep, deep enough to carry a cell phone and iPod without worrying about them popping out, not to mention a wallet.
If even some of the practical features of men's clothing could be carried over to women's, it would probably not only result in safer cell phones but also less time wasted hemming pants and trying to figure out a brand's sizing system. But that would be too easy, wouldn't it?
No comments:
Post a Comment